A blog for sharing my math interests on the web, to post new materials for elementary, secondary and teacher ed, and vent mathematical steam when needed. Thanks for visiting!
Pages
▼
Thursday, June 30, 2011
Grading
It was disconcerting recently to realize that my grading policy is still dysfunctional. As much as I've moved towards standards-based grading for content, end result evaluation, and student-chosen exemplars, there's vestiges of teacher control and obedience.
With my spectacular grad class this summer (see here and here), there's still an attendance policy. I felt a conflict because going by my own policy would mean giving a grade or two below A to students who exceeded my goals for the course. I asked the students how they felt about it. All inservice teachers, they asked "were the goals met?"
I was lucky in that this was about an A, A- or B+. No heart-rending decisions. But in another situation, it easily could be.
In the end I did the right thing. But now I'm considering how much coercion I want in my syllabi. I make class worthwhile, as much as I can. (This class's most frequent student evaluation comment was wanting more classes to explore what we did in more depth.) Do I have to try to make my students come to class? Is it coercion or support? You know, to help them make the "right" decision.
As it is, I get requests to have more due dates, and require things from them more frequently. Do they need it? What can I do instead, with which I can live? Help!
Images: from the excellent but on hiatus wetherobots.com.
Maybe a variation on David's "gradual release of control" idea - give students a highly structured and prescrIbed course at first (lots of specificity, etc.) but with a "drawdown" as the semester moves on. Move toward student control and tell students this is what's happening.
ReplyDeleteI just found your blog, and I love it! I can't wait to go through and read your past posts.
ReplyDelete